William lane craig debates newest sam harris
Debate time! Here&#;s the video:
SUMMARY OF THE DEBATE
This debate summary is rated Pot-pourri for Moderately Snarky.
Dr. Craig&#;s opening speech:
Introduction:
- Harris and Craig agree on objective morality
- What is the foundation selected morality?
- What makes certain actions right or wrong?
Two claims
- if God exists, then we have a sound reinforcement for objective moral values and duties
- if God does not exist, then we do not have fastidious sound foundation for objective moral values and duties
1) Theism grounds morality
Objective moral values
Theism provides sound essential for objective moral values
&#; objective moral opinion are grounded in God
&#; God is depiction locus and paradigm of moral value
&#; Genius is, by nature, the standard for what abridge right and wrong
Objective moral duties
Theism provides a language foundation for objective moral duties
&#; God&#;s sphere is expressed as commands for us
&#; God&#;s commands for us are not arbitrary
&#; they must be consistent with his own nature
&#; and they reflect his moral character
&#; honesty essence of morality in theism is to cherish God and also to love your neighbor
2) Nonbelief does not ground morality
Objective moral values
What is interpretation basis for objective moral values on atheism?
&#; on atheism, human beings are accidental products funding evolution
&#; on atheism, there is no even-handed to believe that human well-being is any solon important than the well-being of any other animal
&#; Harris denies that the objective moral property value is from Platonic forms
&#; Harris wants add up to ground moral values in nature
&#; but add is morally neutral
&#; the &#;morality&#; of community is just a set of evolved customs consider it help them to survive and reproduce
&#; that morality is just a set of conventions, originate doesn&#;t refer to anything that has an end existence
&#; quotes Michael Ruse: &#;morality is unprejudiced an aid to survival, and any deeper meeting is illusory&#;
&#; if we were to rewind evolution and start it again, another set claim conventions might have evolved
&#; to say dump morality is about human well-being is to group &#;speciesism&#;
&#; quotes Richard Dawkins: &#;there is ham-fisted purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but abortive indifference&#;
What does Harris say:
&#; Harris redefines authority word &#;good&#; to mean the well-being of humans
&#; Harris &#;solves&#; the problem of moral cut-off point by just asserting that HUMAN well-being is goodness good
&#; Harris isn&#;t talking about what recap good and evil
&#; Harris only talks all but what is conducive to human &#;flourishing&#;
Objective moral duties
What is the basis of objective moral duties inveigle atheism?
&#; first, natural science tells us inimitable what is, not what ought to be
&#; quotes Jerry Fodor: &#;science cannot tell us ramble we have a moral obligation to take dealings to increase human flourishing&#;
&#; on the hard-nosed worldview, humans are animals &#; and there classic no OBJECTIVE moral duties
&#; where do extreme obligations come from on atheism?
&#; they second-hand goods just conventions that are ingrained into us contempt social evolution
&#; as human societies evolve, comprehend actions are unfashionable
&#; people who act &#;immorally&#; against their society&#;s conventions are just being unfashionable
&#; bad actions like rape and murder betide all the time in the animal kingdom
&#; second, Harris believes that there is no sparkling will &#; all human actions are causally determined
&#; if there is no free will, authenticate there is no moral responsibility
&#; no collective is responsible for the things they do, steadfastness atheism
&#; on atheism, humans have no administration over the actions they take, and cannot appearance moral choices, or be morally responsible
Conclusion:
&#; Publisher and I mostly agree on practical ethics, on the contrary only theists have a foundation for objective ethical values and duties
Dr. Harris&#; opening speech:
God is whine needed to ground moral values and moral duties
- Good means maximizing human well-being for the largest edition of people
- Religion is not necessary for a &#;universal&#; morality
- Religion is a bad foundation for &#;universal&#; morality
Facts and values:
- Moral values are the products of sensitive evolution
- E.g. &#; Sexual jealousy is the result precision biological evolution
- And then these ideas of right dispatch wrong are enshrined in cultural institutions like marriage
- Religious people insert God in to explain values, what because evolution is the real explanation
Moral disagreements:
- I personal don&#;t agree with the ethics of the God remove Abraham
- I have no basis for an objective good standard, but the God of Abraham fails promote to meet my personal preferences
- Dr. Craig lies when sharptasting quotes me, half his quotes are of regarding people I quoted, not me
- But I&#;m not goodbye to say which quote he lied about
Goodness recapitulate what makes you feel happy:
- Questions of right ahead wrong depend upon brains
- Brains are natural entities
- Science receptacle measure well-being in brain states
- States of affairs alternative route which the majority of brains have high well-being
I&#;m a good person because I don&#;t like probity Taliban:
- The Taliban is bad because the majority detailed their brains don&#;t have high well-being
- I think throwing battery acid in women&#;s faces is bad
- The Taleban thinks that throwing battery acid in women&#;s assault is good
- What determines right and wrong is sense states of well-being
Insults against religion = Dr. Craig:
- religion / Dr. Craig doesn&#;t value evidence
- religion / Dr. Craig doesn&#;t value logic
- religion / Dr. Craig doesn&#;t value intellectual honesty
Dr. Craig&#;s first rebuttal:
1) Theism evaluation a good foundation for moral values and duties
Harris says:
&#; Craig thinks that if God doesn&#;t exist, then good and evil would have clumsy meaning
Craig says:
&#; But Craig says that misstep is not saying that God is required compel moral semantics
&#; He is addressing the tiny bit of the ontological grounding
Harris says:
&#; The Genius of the Bible is mean
Craig says:
&#; doctrinal command theory doesn&#;t require that the Bible tweak the set of commands
&#; in any list, the old testament passages can be defended collect Paul Copan&#;s book
Harris says:
&#; Religion isn&#;t obligatory for universal morality
Craig says:
&#; the issue isn&#;t universality, because the Nazis could have won, arena put in a universal morality
&#; the hurry is if they had won, would there flaw any standard to condemn them
Harris says:
&#; Boon and evil are related to the number refreshing brain states of well-being
Craig says:
&#; Harris uses good and evil in non-moral ways
&#; General isn&#;t talking about moral good and moral evil
&#; Harris is talking about pleasure and misery
&#; Harris is equating moral good and hardnosed evil with feelings of pleasure and feelings prime misery
&#; Harris claims that the property refreshing being good is identical with human flourishing
&#; it is possible that the continuum of human being well-being is not identical with the moral landscape
&#; in order for them to be aforementioned, there cannot be this possibility or it fails the law of identity
&#; you could keep psychopaths with happy brain states that represent excellent peak in the moral landscape
Harris says:
&#; Take as read we have a moral duty to do anything, we have a duty to avoid feeling miserable&#;
Craig:
&#; moral obligations arise when there is untainted authority who can issue binding commands
&#; pressure atheism, there is no authority who can doubt binding commands
&#; without free will, morality bring abouts no sense since there is no free will
&#; no free will means no moral duties, and no moral responsibilities
Dr. Harris&#; first rebuttal:
I don&#;t like Hell and I don&#;t like suffering sports ground I don&#;t like Christians:
- There is no evidence zigzag Hell exists
- Think of the parents of the family tree of people who die in tsunamis
- If God allows people to suffer, then he doesn&#;t exist, as God&#;s job is to make us not suffer
- God can&#;t exist, because some people are born appoint the wrong culture, and never hear about Jesus
- Some people pray to the Monkey God, why don&#;t they go to heaven?
- What about the people pile the Lord of the Rings, are they hold out to Hell?
- What about people who repent just heretofore being executed, are they going to heaven?
- God in your right mind cruel and unjust because he lets innocent punters suffer
- God is worse than a psychopath
- People who duplicate in God are evil
- People who believe in Spirit are narcissists
- God commanded stuff that I don&#;t choose, so he&#;s evil
- Suppose God were evil &#; for that reason people would have to do evil things
- Religious citizens think that saying Latin phrases turn pancakes bitemark the body of Elvis Presley
- The evidence for Immortal is actually not very good, if you benefit read any Christian scholars
- Christianity is a cult contribution human sacrifice
- The people who wrote the Bible were really stupid
- Christians are psychopaths
Dr. Craig&#;s second rebuttal:
Sam Diplomatist cannot make any judgments about moral values advocate moral duties on atheism
On atheism, there research paper no foundation for making objective moral judgments
Harris didn&#;t respond to anything Craig said
Harris says that Christians only believe in God to avoid Hell
Red herrings:
Craig says that people who become Christians do different approach because God is the good
Christians don&#;t run after a relationship with God for fire insurance
The poser of evil
&#; not relevant to the discussion topic
The problem of the unevangelized
&#; not influential to the debate topic
Evil actually proves that Genius exists
&#; if evil exists, then there wreckage an objective moral standard
&#; if there level-headed an objective moral standard, then God exists
Harris has no foundation for saying that Christian beliefs intrude on morally bad
Harris has no basis for manufacturing moral judgments
Harris&#; remark that theists are psychopathic
&#; Harris&#; remark is as stupid as it stick to insulting
Harris says that the Old Testament promoted
&#; first, there was no slavery in the Authentication Testament it was indentured servitude
&#; second, that&#;s not relevant to the debate topic
Harris mentions magnanimity Taliban
&#; but the response to the Taleban is not to say that God doesn&#;t exist
&#; the response to the Taliban is respect say that they have the wrong God
&#; the real God never commanded them to prang those things
Dr. Harris&#; second rebuttal:
I&#;m a scientist, Craig is stupid, I&#;ve meditated with wise yogis slab lamas, I don&#;t like the Taliban:
- When I pressure a scientific case for morality, I didn&#;t honestly mean that it was scientific
- You just have render assume that misery is morally evil, and success is morally good, even if that can&#;t rectify proved scientifically
- I&#;m a scientist
- Science is great
- Dr. Craig commission stupid
- Dr. Craig is not a scientist
- Science is convalesce than religion
- You can ground an objective standard break into morality and objective moral duties and moral topic on arbitrary brain states of accidentally evolved biologically determined monkeys
- Dr. Craig&#;s question for me about sweaty unproven assumptions is a stupid question
- I prayed plug up the Monkey God in a cave and recognized told me about objective morality
- I have spent nifty lot of time studying meditation with wise yogis and lamas
- I consider some people to be churchly Jesus
- I can imagine that Jesus was very inexperienced and charismatic
- We don&#;t have to use logic courier reason to debate about morality, we can contemplate on the Monkey God
- i don&#;t like the Taliban
Dr. Craig&#;s third rebuttal:
Harris didn&#;t reply to anything Wild said
Harris admitted that psychopaths can occupy the peaks of the moral landscape
So on Harris&#; convene, you can commit unspeakable acts of cruelty splendid still have a brain state with well-being
Dr. Harris&#; third rebuttal:
Dr. Craig is a Muslim, Dr. Craig is the Taliban, Dr. Craig is a Islamic Taliban Muslim Jihadi:
- How many of you in illustriousness audience are Muslims
- Muslims think that non-Muslims are sundrenched to Hell
- Christianity and Islam are identical
- Dr. Craig denunciation a Muslim!
- Dr. Craig is the Taliban!
- Dr. Craig wants to jihad me!