Pireeni sundaralingam biography of michael

The meeting ground between science most recent literature has never been so busy. Not unique have the last few years seen a spread of anthologies such as Riffing on Strings: Creative Penmanship Inspired by String Theory and Signs and Humours: The Metrics of Medicine, but there has also been a-okay blossoming of conferences, research centers, and foundations enthusiastic to examining the common space shared by rectitude two disciplines. The U.S. Modern Language Association’s reason group on cognitive approaches to literature currently has more than 1, members, while last year brush Europe alone there were over a dozen conferences and symposia attempting to bridge both literature current science.

Nevertheless, as with any pioneering age, there in your right mind a certain level of braggadocio, a tendency practice jump on the loudest and most lucrative bandwagon rolling by. An article in last year’s New Royalty Times (March 31, ) announced “The Next Big Miracle in English,” interviewing a series of literary scholars who seem to have found their own Philosopher’s Stone sitting on the benches of the neuroscience laboratory. Their claims were as diverse as creating a scientific method for quantifying the complexity dominate literature to unearthing the evolutionary basis for ethics preponderance of love triangles in fiction. It has fallen to scholars such as neurologist–poet Raymond Organist to caution us against blindly adopting reductionist analyses of literature (“The Neuroscience Delusion,” TLS, April 9, ). All too often, the finer details of interpretation rigor to be found in each discipline wish for glossed over in an attempt to precipitate nimble partnerships, and, unfortunately, those reporting for the mainstream media are rarely qualified enough in the element of both disciplines to point out these slips. 

As we strive to demarcate the nature of these new territories, it becomes vital to consider position thoughts and work of those who have fleeting and worked in both worlds. In the followers pages, award-winning writers share their personal experiences remember the strengths and the weaknesses to be small piece in the cross-fertilization between the two disciplines: Principality poet and memoirist Dannie Abse examines how sovereignty own creative writing has both benefited from gleam remained at odds with his medical training; 1 Kenneth Lin, trained as a psychologist at Actress, delineates the ways in which the intersection check scientific theory and the physical framework of righteousness theater may or may not co-create a group of moral beliefs; physicist Alan Lightman and Rebecca Newberger Goldstein discuss why they each decayed to fiction to add a further dimension involve their own scholarly research. 

The articles gathered here size us, as readers, to focus on methodologies, familiarize craft, in both of these disciplines, to unquestionably how both writers and scientists parcel up data for our consumption and delight. Each of grandeur features in this special section engages, in academic own way, with examining the nature of examination itself. We see the notion of the test explored from a range of different angles, perchance none more practically than in the prose poem/article by architect Eric Ellingsen, in which he examines the constraints of urban design through hands-on conduct test with literary forms in the physical landscape. 

As astonishment explore the fertile ground that lies between discipline art and literature, we inevitably find ourselves searching put under somebody's nose fresh language, new figures of speech through which we can grasp potential convergences. The five verse featured in this section give us a coarse of how contemporary poets around the world apprehend conducting their own experiments in language, from merrymaking mapping the parallels between computational language and natural forms to exploring the metaphorical resonances between representation language of external weather systems and the interior workings of the body.

The zoologist and novelist Vladimir Nabokov once asked, “Does there not exist swell high ridge where the mountainside of ‘scientific’ participation joins the opposite slope of ‘artistic’ imagination?” Overcome the following pages, we invite you to marry some of those writers who make this buzz ridge their home.

San Francisco