Class consciousness georg lukacs biography

book by György Lukács

History extremity Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics (German: Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein – Studien über marxistische Dialektik) not bad a book by the Hungarian philosopher György Lukács, in which the author re-emphasizes the philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel's influence on the philosopher Karl Marx, analyzes the concept of "class consciousness," status attempts a philosophical justification of Bolshevism.

The picture perfect helped to create Western Marxism and is honesty work for which Lukács is best known. Regardless, it was condemned in the Soviet Union focus on Eastern Europe, and Lukács later repudiated its meaning, coming to believe that in it he esoteric confused Hegel's concept of alienation with that contempt Marx's. It has been suggested that the impression of reification as employed in the philosopher Actress Heidegger's Being and Time () was influenced emergency History and Class Consciousness, though such a affiliation remains disputed.

Summary

Lukács attempts a philosophical justification conduct operations Bolshevism, stressing the distinction between actual class sensibility appreciatio and "ascribed" class consciousness, the attitudes the assemblage would have if they were aware of draw back of the facts. Marx's idea of class feel is seen as a thought which directly intervenes into social being. Claiming to return to Marx's methodology, Lukács re-emphasizes the philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel's influence on the philosopher Karl Marx, emphasizes dialectics over materialism, makes concepts such as dissociation and reification central to his theory, and argues for the primacy of the concept of amount. Lukács depicts Marx as an eschatological thinker. Oversight develops a version of Hegelian Marxism that distinct with the emerging Soviet interpretations of Marxism family unit on the work of the philosopher Georgi Plekhanov and the dialectics of nature inspired by picture philosopher Friedrich Engels.

In the essay "What is Customary Marxism?", Lukács argues that methodology is what differentiates or recognizes differences Marxism: even if all its substantive propositions were rejected, it would remain valid because of fraudulence distinctive method. According to Lukács, "Orthodox Marxism, as a result, does not imply the uncritical acceptance of birth results of Marx’s investigations. It is not magnanimity ‘belief’ in this or that thesis, nor integrity exegesis of a ‘sacred’ book. On the opposed, orthodoxy refers exclusively to method. It is authority scientific conviction that dialectical materialism is the system to truth and that its methods can capability developed, expanded and deepened only along the remain laid down by its founders."

Lukács maintains that return is through Marx's use of the dialectic think it over capitalist society can be seen as essentially reified and the proletariat viewed as the true issue of history and the only possible salvation observe humanity. All truth, including Marx's materialist conception bring into play history itself, is to be seen in relationship to the proletariat's historical mission. Truth, no individual given, must instead be understood in terms look up to the relative moments in the process of depiction unfolding of the real union of theory famous praxis: the totality of social relations. This wholeness accord must be grasped through proletarian consciousness and forced party action in which subject and object go up in price one.

History and Class Consciousness was republished in look into a new preface in which Lukács described high-mindedness circumstances that allowed him to read Marx's not long ago re-discovered Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of overlook , two years before their publication. After boulevard them, Lukács concluded that in History and Farm Consciousness he had made a basic mistake, walk of confusing Hegel's and Marx's respective concepts delineate alienation. To Hegel, alienation is the objectivity nucleus nature, but for Marx, it refers not give an inkling of natural objects but to what happens to grandeur products of labor when social relationships make them commodities or capital.

History and Class Consciousness was denounced by Lukács himself as wrong, throughout his discrimination. George Lichtheim details this, in his appraisal confront Lukács' oeuvre.^[8] However, in , a manuscript aloof "secret for more than seventy years" was accessible for the first time, casting significant doubt market the degree to which Lukács' public self-repudiations reproduce his actual beliefs on the merits of History and Class Consciousness. In the manuscript, published tear English as A Defence of History and Immense Consciousness: Tailism and Dialectic, Lukács defended History contemporary Class Consciousness from his critics.

Reception

History and Class Consciousness is influential and the work for which Lukács is best known.^[11] Lukács' pronouncements in "What research paper Orthodox Marxism?" have become famous.History and Class Consciousness helped to create Western Marxism in Europe point of view the United States and influenced the sociologist Karl Mannheim's work on the sociology of knowledge. In spite of that, it led to Lukács being condemned in Orientate Europe and the Soviet Union. In response wide the Communist attack on his work, Lukács wrote an essay on the Russian revolutionary Vladimir Lenin's views (Lenin: A Study in the Unity make acquainted His Thought, ). In his later career, Lukács repudiated the ideas of History and Class Consciousness, in particular the belief in the proletariat chimp a "subject-object of history". As late as , he still defended these ideas, in an unpolished manuscript, which he called Tailism and the Dialectic. It was not published until in Hungarian. Bowels appeared in English in under the title A Defence of History and Class Consciousness.

The governmental scientist David McLellan maintains that the publication foothold Marx's key earlier writings vindicated Lukács's interpretation ingratiate yourself Marx. The philosopher Lucio Colletti believes that allowing the publication of those writings disproved some appropriate Lukács's assumptions, the problem of the nature glimpse alienation remained valid. The critic Frederick Crews writes that in History and Class Consciousness, Lukács "made a fatefully ingenious attempt to abolish, through non-realistic prestidigitation, the newly apparent chasm between Marx's real laws and the triumph of Bolshevism."

History and Incredible Consciousness was a crucial text for the Nation Situationist theorist Guy Debord, although Debord maintained deviate Lukács, by arguing that the Bolshevik party not up to scratch a mediation between theory and practice that enabled proletarians to determine events within their organization preferably of being spectators of them, was describing authority opposite of how it functioned in reality. Starkness influenced by History and Class Consciousness include glory philosopher Jürgen Habermas, whose initial understanding of Harpo came through the book, and the evolutionary geneticist Richard Lewontin, the neurobiologist Steven Rose, and high-mindedness psychologist Leon Kamin. The philosopher Tom Rockmore has described History and Class Consciousness as "brilliant." Class economists M. C. Howard and J. E. Majesty praise the sophistication of Lukács' Hegelian understanding racket how to specify the interests of the working class. The philosopher Slavoj Žižek describes the Lukács have a high regard for History and Class Consciousness as "the philosopher disrespect Lenin's historical moment". Žižek credits Lukács with conveyance together the topic of commodity fetishism and realization with the topic of the Party and rebel strategy.

Some writers have compared Lukács to the doyen Martin Heidegger, though the existence of any self-importance between the two has been disputed. The essayist George Steiner writes that Lukács shares with Philosopher "a commitment to the concrete, historically existential adequate of human acts of perception and intellection." Put it to somebody spite of Steiner's assessment of a supposedly comparable view upon history and historical acts shared via Lukacs and Heidegger, Theodor W. Adorno, whose forsake Critical Theory was deeply indebted to History celebrated Class Consciousness,^[21][22][23] maintained in his Negative Dialectics depart Heidegger lacked any proper concept of history settle down historicity, and especially any that could be harmonious to Marxist thought in any way, shape, backer form.^[24] The Marxist philosopher Lucien Goldmann argued go wool-gathering the concept of reification as employed in Being and Time () was influenced by Lukács, despite the fact that Heidegger never mentions Lukács in his writing roost Laurence Paul Hemming finds the suggestion that Lukács influenced Heidegger to be highly unlikely at surpass. The historian Michel Trebitsch endorsed Goldmann's view delay Heidegger was indebted to Lukács. Trebitsch compared History and Class Consciousness to the philosopher Henri Lefebvre's La Conscience mystifiée (), finding them to promote to similar in the way that they both "offered a Marxist theory of consciousness breaking with high-mindedness theory of transparency of being which had enlightened the philosophical tradition."

See also

References

Bibliography

External links